Miguel-Angel Lopez Jaen vs Pierre-Ludovic Duclos Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L W L L W L W
Form
L L W L W L W L L WHead-2-Head: Jaen 1 - 1 Duclos
They have played 4 sets in total, with Jaen winning 2 and Duclos winning 2. The last match between Jaen and Duclos was at the Palermo Challenger, 21-09-2009, First, Clay with Miguel-Angel Lopez Jaen getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Miguel-Angel Lopez Jaen | 1 |
| Pierre-Ludovic Duclos | 1 |
Palermo Challenger(21-09-2009)
| Jaen | Stats | Duclos |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 171 | Highest Rank | 229 |
| 42 | Age | 39 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 4 |
| 54% (331-281) | Career Total W/L | 54% (261-220) |
| $29,080 | Career Prize Money | $31,600 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Pegula VS Uchijima PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Rybakina VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Miguel-Angel Lopez Jaen
Player
Pierre-Ludovic Duclos
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
| 6-4 7-6(7) | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 22 | Games Won | 17 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 73% (29/40) | 1st Serve % | 62% (31/50) |
| 83% (24/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (16/31) |
| 55% (6/11) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (6/19) |
| 71% (5/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 56% (28/50) | Return Points Win % | 25% (10/40) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Miguel-Angel Lopez Jaen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 0-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 1-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Pierre-Ludovic Duclos Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Pierre-Ludovic Duclos
Player
Franko Skugor
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Hans Podlipnik-Castillo
Player
Pierre-Ludovic Duclos
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Rice
Player
Pierre-Ludovic Duclos
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
92)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pierre-Ludovic Duclos
Player
Sean Thornley
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lewis Burton
Player
Pierre-Ludovic Duclos
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
14 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pierre-Ludovic Duclos
Player
Onur Kargin
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pierre-Ludovic Duclos
Player
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe
67%
(
76 of
113)
1st Serve %
54%
(
66 of
122)
7
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
36%
(
41 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
51 of
122)
123
Total Points Won
112
|
5-7 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Pierre-Ludovic Duclos
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
7
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Flavio Cipolla
Player
Pierre-Ludovic Duclos
77%
(
63 of
82)
1st Serve %
45%
(
40 of
88)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
14 of
48)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
48 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (331/281) | Win/Loss | 54% (261/220) |
| 54% (756/657) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (601/512) |
| 51% (6786/6398) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (5411/5078) |
| 59% (68/48) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (179/136) |
| 54% (258/222) | Clay Win/Loss | 47% (38/43) |
| 33% (5/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49% (32/33) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 60% (12/8) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 129 | Aces Total | 522 |
| 0.01 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.07 |
| 60 | Total Double Faults | 346 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 512.54 | Average Opponent Rank | 539.77 |
| 63% (1629/2602) | 1st Serve % | 59% (3938/6730) |
| 65% (1059/1629) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (2794/3938) |
| 48% (466/973) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1389/2792) |
| 37% (83/224) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (199/524) |
| 37% (923/2479) | Return Points Win % | 36% (2426/6761) |
| 45% (5/6) | Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 11% (1/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (10/12) | Main Tour W/L | 47% (14/16) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (74/69) | Challenger W/L | 52% (124/113) |
| 56% (242/194) | Futures W/L | 60% (121/82) |
| 54% (326/604) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (256/473) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 52% (85/165) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (75/149) |
| 50% (95/191) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (72/154) |
| 84% (340/286) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (273/220) |
| 16% (340/54) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (273/53) |
| 17% (271/45) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (207/39) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
